After reviewing the student’s
original response to the expected response, I have come to the conclusion that
the student is a proficient reader. Although there were miscues throughout the reading, they did
not change the meaning of the text. Weaver stresses the importance that “the
goal of reading instruction should not be the accurate identification of every
word, but rather the effective and efficient use of reading strategies in order
to construct meaning.” Although there were miscues throughout the reading, it
is evident that the reader was still able to construct meaning. After reading
the text and comparing the student’s responses, I have concluded that this
student is a moderately effective reader.
Although I do not have much
classroom experience, I am able to connect that the miscues that did occur
throughout the reading dealt with functioning words. It is evident that the
student comprehends what he/she is reading because the miscues that did occur
did not change the meaning of the text. During my third grade class, we
constantly practiced flexible grouping during reading based on students
reading, comprehension of the text, and recalling details. I feel as though it
is very important to pay attention to these things when completing reading
instruction in the classroom. If several students are having the same miscues,
then it would be beneficial to place them in a small group together in order to
focus on a specific concept that they may need additional help in.
I agree with you Taylor, I believe this student is a proficient reader. The miscues given did not change the meaning of the text, therefore the reader was comprehending the material. I think comprehension should be the primary focus. It's similar to having students understand the big picture, and then go back and focus on the details. I also like that you mentioned putting students in a small group if they are having similar difficulties. It's a great way to teach to the needs of certain students.
ReplyDelete